Wednesday, July 16, 2014

#ROW80 3RD QTR WEDNESDAY CHECK-IN - "PRELUDE" 1ST DRAFT - "MUSIC OF THE SPHERES"


PRELUDE

Music of the Spheres. . . well. I had to call it something. Music has always been a part of my life and is something that I used as a conduit to another place. I hear that a lot and I get that; stuff about how one is "transported," or "forgets their problems," and it's a lot of bullshit. Maybe it is so for other people, but I'm not talking about that kind of transportation. I'm a musician and was born one. Something that I just knew, like a lot of stuff we just know, in an unconscious, visceral way, although when I knew it, I was too young to articulate all of that. It's an atavistic knowing, like an animal knows it must migrate along with its fellow beings. It can either be a blessing or a goddamned werewolf, or both, but it has to be answered and lived up to, even when life has other ideas. Even when you're mentally ill, like Bederich Smetana and so many other composers and players and you're not always sure you have anything like a half-assed grasp on reality, because you've seen and felt and done and experienced things that you know are true, even if the rest of the world remains either unconvinced, or worse yet, clueless, because it takes insight, guts, heart and the willingness to step off of that cliff, knowing that a convergence of faith and scientific knowledge will see you through, to do what is absolutely the right thing. Both morally and universally and I mean that both literally and figuratively. If you stick with me and have some patience, as I de-construct my tale, I promise you, it will be worth it.


The philosopher, Frederic Nietzsche once said, or is said to have said, or maybe thought it—I tend to get fuzzy on details, although the larger picture is accurate—that "Life without music would be a mistake". I absolutely believe that to be true, and not in an "oops" kind of way, but in a cataclysmic destroyer-of-worlds-Shiva kind of way. And it's not only because I yearn, cry and laugh when I hear music, but I also mourn, feel pain, rage, and dread. In short, the entire panoply of human emotions are writ large, in music, and I along with a majority of the human race get that. If you don't believe me, just listen to Beethoven's 3rd Symphony.

It is every emotion I just mentioned, plus a smattering of syncopation, that sounds suspiciously jazzy. When other artists in other disciplines are asked what they consider they highest form of art to be, it is natural that musicians say "music is the highest form of expression of the arts," but then, someone like Nic Cage comes along and says the very same thing. This from a man who can do and become literally anything on film. That is high praise for an art, indeed. I recognize and understand what he is saying, because I turn the analogy on it's head this way: Boxing is the highest form of sport and sportsmanship, because of its artistry and brutality; it is truly the Sweet Science.

In no other sport is there the complexity of thought, physicality, rhythm, discipline, harmony and timing. I have run into other musicians at boxing matches and it's noteworthy that at first we're surprised, embarrassed to be caught out, and then. . . not so much. Because we all recognize the same thing in the fighters. So, I understood Nic Cage when I first started watching his movies; my fascination with him lay not in his acting, but in his performance as an artist. I think at one time, we all shared that fascination with creating music and the inherent instincts or feelings that have been there from birth, not just as babies, but as a civilization, remain and will never become vestigial.

Tchaikovsky is one of the hardest of composers for me to listen to when I am in a depressed state. Black unto black, I could not listen at all to his 6th symphony for almost a year after my father died. The last movement of that piece, written not long before his death is completely without hope. What a horrible, horrible emotion to experience, and even more terrible for the fact that he was able to articulate it so thoroughly through his composing, and understood his own pain. It is monumental in it's suffering and truly beautiful, but if you're having a bad day, month, year, or decade, it's best to avoid his 6th Symphony; the beautiful third movement waltz in 5/4 time and all. Skip the whole thing and go zone out to that famous bubble-gum composer's greatest hits: Mozart. Ick.

But, if it took Tchaikovsky to break my heart, it took Mahler to steal it away and then, lose it in a way I could never retrieve it. Not because of the dark magic and nature of his music, but because he shows such a human side and such a hopeful one, in the face of withering and horrible circumstances. He, being a Bohemian composer, has the odd, folk-music way of playing what seems to be happy-go-lucky tunes in a Major key, while underlying all, is a minor underpinning. Mahler "got it" through his music, which is so human and heartfelt as to be terrifying, but not in his life, which is far different than Pyotr Tchaikovsky, and all the more tragic for his not knowing, or understanding how black his life would become.

Married to the beautiful Alma, he forebore her infidelities, and was to have said, just 2 weeks before his death, from myocarditis, at age 51, "Ah, Alma, we will live forever!" In his 1st symphony, he has a funeral march, that is of an animal, buried by animals, they periodically break out into the hellishness of a gypsy-klezmer group gone completely off the rails, before once again regaining their composure and fall back into their dirge-like procession, as they bear the corpse to it's final repose. The music seems to ask at the end, "Can I not linger, just a while longer? I'm having such a good time. . .” These are my impressions, my feelings; that's another great thing about music. Although we're hard-wired to accept basic fundamentals as fact, say, Major versus minor keys, music is entirely subjective. Musicology bedamned; I am sure Musicologists imparted some greater meaning to that passage, but I hear a simple plea to hang around for a bit more of the fun.

I got more out of Music History for time and place, than I did in Music Theory for ear-training (I have perfect pitch, and thus, am lazy, so I did a lot of coasting in music school) and why humans are drawn to certain tones; we all “agree” on the basic language. Interesting enough and if this be true, and I believe it to be so, what else is drawn to these tones; these chords. Because I do not for one second believe that we are the only sentient beings in the universe. You see, the universe has a tone, a note, a key, if you will. A note that we all contribute to. Some say it's E flat, some say F or F sharp. I think it's all of those and more, because the universe is ever-changing and is not an entropic thing. In a way it's like the "you'll change history if you go back in time and step on a butterfly," but not really, Because we change courses everyday, just as we change our note. It is a sonic, universal symphony.

Victor Hugo referred to it in his masterpiece “Hunchback of Notre Dame”, in his description of Easter or Pentecost in Paris in the fifteenth century:

. . . beneath the rising sun of Easter or of Pentecost--climb upon some elevated point, whence you command the entire capital; and be present at the wakening of the chimes. Behold, at a signal given from heaven, for it is the sun which gives it, all those churches quiver simultaneously. First come scattered strokes, running from one church to another, as when musicians give warning that they are about to begin. Then, all at once, behold!--for it seems at times, as though the ear also possessed a sight of its own,--behold, rising from each bell tower, something like a column of sound, a cloud of harmony. First, the vibration of each bell mounts straight upwards, pure and, so to speak, isolated from the others, into the splendid morning sky; then, little by little, as they swell they melt together, mingle, are lost in each other, and amalgamate in a magnificent concert. It is no longer anything but a mass of sonorous vibrations incessantly sent forth from the numerous belfries; floats, undulates, bounds, whirls over the city, and prolongs far beyond the horizon the deafening circle of its oscillations.

Nevertheless, this sea of harmony is not a chaos; great and profound as it is, it has not lost its transparency; you behold the windings of each group of notes which escapes from the belfries. You can follow the dialogue, by turns grave and shrill, of the treble and the bass; you can see the octaves leap from one tower to another; you watch them spring forth, winged, light, and whistling, from the silver bell, to fall, broken and limping from the bell of wood; you admire in their midst the rich gamut which incessantly ascends and re-ascends the seven bells of Saint-Eustache; you see light and rapid notes running across it, executing three or four luminous zigzags, and vanishing like flashes of lightning. Yonder is the Abbey of Saint-Martin, a shrill, cracked singer; here the gruff and gloomy voice of the Bastille; at the other end, the great tower of the Louvre, with its bass. The royal chime of the palace scatters on all sides, and without relaxation, resplendent trills, upon which fall, at regular intervals, the heavy strokes from the belfry of Notre-Dame, which makes them sparkle like the anvil under the hammer. At intervals you behold the passage of sounds of all forms which come from the triple peal of Saint-Germaine des Prés. Then, again, from time to time, this mass of sublime noises opens and gives passage to the beats of the Ave Maria, which bursts forth and sparkles like an aigrette of stars. Below, in the very depths of the concert, you confusedly distinguish the interior chanting of the churches, which exhales through the vibrating pores of their vaulted roofs.”


I sure as HELL am no Victor Hugo, but then, I'm no Jascha Heifetz and I got along just swell on the viola; maybe I can pull off the same trick in telling my story. I used to scuba-dive off the coast of California in Monterey. Too young and stupid to know better, I and a cohort dove off the pier and went towards the edge of the Continental Shelf. The Continental Shelf is defined as "a submerged border of a continent that slopes gradually and extends to a point of steeper descent to the ocean bottom". The gradual sloping part varies, however, and we knew the particular spot where the drop was precipitous and sharp. The Pacific Ocean is cold and we were both wearing full wet suits.

After clawing our way through the kelp beds and swimming off shore for a while, the water rapidly deepened, as the drop-off of the shelf came up swiftly. The water there is inky black, and seems almost viscous. We slowed as we approached and held our breaths. As I recall, we were down about 60 or 70 feet; this would not be a decompression dive. When we stuck our heads out over the shelf and took a peek, the water, no, the space, was so much blacker; stygian, more viscous-like; almost gelatinous, inky and beyond cold. So very cold, that the contrast between the warmth of my wet suit and the upwelling water was instantly felt, but the thing I remember most as we hung our heads out over this. . . thing that seemed almost alive, and, that we later found out was the sea bed, that went from 60 or 70 feet to over 2000 feet or more, was the sound it made.

The Continental Shelf makes a sound, much like the sound you hear when you put your ear up to a garden hose and listen, when the water isn't running. It's a hollow, spooky sound. It thrums and changes and seems to echo and it's all around you. You can feel it in your bones, your ears; your heart. It is deep; probably too deep a note for the human ear to discern, were one on land, but here, you are submerged in it. Not in the heart of it, but more near the top. I remember thinking that to be at the heart of this great sound would be eerie indeed, and I might not survive such an encounter. It was terrible and gorgeous in its significance and weight. It too, has its own note and changes in pitch and frequency, I am sure, with the changing of the tides, seasons and pollution and man-made structures that come and go over the centuries. Now, apply that to the universe. That, my friends, is the "Music of the Spheres".


This is the first draft of the prologue to my novel I wrote for #NaNoWriMo in 2013. Any constructive criticism would be much appreciated, since I have never done anything like this before. Thank you from the bottom of my heart!

Sunday, July 13, 2014

SOULLESS "COVER REVEAL" by CRYSTAL COLLIER!

I love doing these cover reveals and interviews for my favorite authors and all-around wonderful friends that I've met in the two-plus years that I have been blogging. As a rule, you all are a generous bunch and fun to be around and last April, when we were doing the A-to-Z Challenge, I had the great good fortune to run into several new and zany friends! As is my wont, I offered my website as a place for you and this is a standing rule, to do cover reveals, host interviews with your characters, allow me to ask you questions; in short, anything that will help you sell an extra book or three. I enjoy doing this and I always find new things to read. So! With that in mind, today, we're hosting the COVER REVEAL of Crystal Collier's new book, "Soulless". This looks like a marvelous book and Crystal is a marvelous lady, who loves cheese. We bonded immediately when I found this out during an A-to-Z chat. Anyway, with no further verbiage, here is Ms. Collier's COVER REVEAL!


Have you met the Soulless and Passionate? In the world of 1770 where supernatural beings mix with humanity, Alexia is playing a deadly game.

SOULLESS, Book 2 in the Maiden of Time trilogy

Alexia manipulated time to save the man of her dreams, and lost her best friend to red-eyed wraiths. Still grieving, she struggles to reconcile her loss with what was gained: her impending marriage. But when her wedding is destroyed by the Soulless—who then steal the only protection her people have—she's forced to unleash her true power.

And risk losing everything.

What people are saying about this series: 

"With a completely unique plot that keeps you guessing and interested, it brings you close to the characters, sympathizing with them and understanding their trials and tribulations." --SC, Amazon reviewer

"It's clean, classy and supernaturally packed with suspense, longing, intrigue and magic." --Jill Jennings, TX

"SWOON." --Sherlyn, Mermaid with a Book Reviewer

Crystal Collier is a young adult author who pens dark fantasy, historical, and romance hybrids. She can be found practicing her brother-induced ninja skills while teaching children or madly typing about fantastic and impossible creatures. She has lived from coast to coast and now calls Florida home with her creative husband, three littles, and “friend†(a.k.a. the zombie locked in her closet). Secretly, she dreams of world domination and a bottomless supply of cheese. You can find her on her blog and Facebook, or follow her on Twitter.


COMING October 13, 2014



PREORDER your print copy
or 
Sign up for Crystal Collier's newsletter to receive release news and freebies.

#ROW80 3RD QTR 2014, SUNDAY CHECK-IN – POST 3 – BUT IS IT ART?


I've gone back and finished “Under the Dome” by Stephen King, and I cannot say that it was my favorite King book ever, or even up there in the 50 percentile. I don't really know why this is, but as time has passed and books like “The Stand”, “Salem's Lot”, “Dead Zone” and even “The Shining” come up on their 30th plus years' anniversaries, they look more like books written by someone who was truly serious about literature in general and in horror specifically. One of his finest books, “Different Seasons” produced three exemplary novellas; an extremely difficult form to master, and they were rich in language and satisfying, even in their brevity. “Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption”, “Apt Pupil”, and “The Body” each left behind the supernatural and horror genres King was famous for at the time and they were resoundingly wonderful to read.

courtesy: firewireblog.com

There is a television show of the same name. I got through about 14 minutes of it and had to turn off the tee vee. I understand it's been renewed.

But, it seemed to me, that after the publishing of “It”, King had hit a wall, or gotten into a rut. I'm not saying his writing became formulaic, although, after so many books, some of the characters do take on a sameness. What bothers me specifically is that his writing voice has become artificial. It becomes harder and harder, with exceptions to buy into whatever his characters' scrapes, situations, life-and-death perils and choices are about and I find myself dwelling more and more on the voice that is telling the tale, and to me it is not ringing true.

Maybe all wildly successful authors go through this; they hit their stride and they find just the right note with an audience, and subconsciously, they begin writing TO that audience, rather than just spinning out their tales. One of my favorite authors, Aldrea Alien, says in her bio “Since discovering the love of writing at the age of twelve, she hasn't found an ounce of peace from the characters plaguing her mind.” I love that; she puts her stories out there and they are hum-dingers. She's writing currently about a race of lizard-people and there are all sorts of things afoot. Being totally rational, and given to reading history books, I was a bit skeptical at first, but she makes it so damned REAL, that her world is easy to buy into. Her worlds are spectacular and her plots are action-filled. Lizard-people, huh. Who'da thunk it? Her characters are fully-fleshed and their actions spring organically, from their previous experiences and lives.

courtesy: thardrandria.blogspot.com                                       

 
"The Rogue King" Available on Amazon.com. Again, as one who reads crime fiction, or history books, I became instantly captivated with Aldrea's Koral and his struggles and the world he lives in.
 
Back to the “Dome”, and King's writing; a quick synopsis can be found here. Some of King's characters make this kind of organic sense, most notably, Dale Barbara, the protagonist of the book. As a veteran of Dubya's mis-informed incursion into Iraq, Barbara is familiar with the techniques of torture and humiliation that were de rigueur as a part of an occupying unit in the Army, but that was not who he was, and ultimately, his decency and humanity win out. After a brief stint in Chester Mill's jail, which sees his life threatened by Junior Rennie, who conveniently has a brain tumor, which is causing him to be not just evil like his father, but overtly batshit, Barbara is freed, to lead the good faction, that eventually wins out.

courtesy: schmoesknow.com

"Big" Jim Rennie, as portrayed by the awesome Dean Norris, late of "Breaking Bad". This man can do good and evil equally well, and it's too bad King didn't have him for a template in the book. As it is, he is infinitely creepier in the show (so I've heard and can believe) than what King originally wrote.

The problem for me is the antagonist, Big Jim Rennie, used car salesman and 2nd town Selectman, who is just pure evil, through and through and of such a cartoonish quality, I find it hard to buy into ANYTHING he is selling, whether it be a car, or his own home-spun philosophy, regarding who should run the town after the Dome has fallen. No reason is given, as to his badness; did he wet the bed as a kid? Were his parents dysfunctional? Who the hell knows and I really was well-nigh fed up with him and his stupid dialogue.

courtesy: fanpop.com

Dale Barbara is played by actor Mike Vogel in the series; he seems to have made little impression on me, as I registered him as a cipher. He also seems to be a bit younger than your average Iraqi war vet, but hey, that's tee vee!

This is another thing about King that drives me batshit. In “The Stand”, people, including Randall Flagg, acted and talked like normal people; you could buy into Flagg's brand of Evil, because it was so subtle; so seductive. But with Big Jim, I find it hard to believe that he could hoodwink an entire town and run a successful methamphetamine lab out of the Christers' radio station WCIK and people NOT know about it; the guy is as subtle as a lead balloon. The kind of lead balloon that has a gondola and people would ride in, not a kid's balloon; he's that obvious and non-creepy. Everyone's a "cotton-picker" and/or a "Son of a Buck" which wears thin, and that falsity of his language piles onto the falseness of his character. If we're meant to believe that he is a Town Selectman (one out of three, who all seem reasonably sane, although one of them has a drug addiction, which she manages to kick, 40 seconds before her gruesome death at a town gathering; very King-esque) then, we must assume the rest of the town doesn't give two hoots and a holler, or they're all on meth, which turns out not to be the case.

courtesy: collider.com

Julia Shumway, played by Rachelle Lefevre, on the show "Under the Dome". In the book, Julia is the town's sole editor of the newspaper and is several years older than Dale Barbara, but that doesn't usually play well in tee vee land. In the book, Julia goes to the Space Kids and makes a lone plea for mercy to be let free. It works, but the ending feels tacked on, rushed and there's no sense of resolution.

The ending didn't work for me either; it was more Star Trek (to quote Wikipedia) in the “Can't we all just get along” school of reasoning by Julia Shumway, than anything else. The idea that Space Kids were looking at these people under a Dome from a jillion miles and observing their goings-on, much in the way kids have looked at ant farms is not a new one, nor is the idea of sequestering a bunch of individuals – people, pigs, cows, whatever – as in “Lord of the Flies” to see what they do in the absence of authority. But most certainly, Julia's little heart-felt plea at the very end of the book, resulting in the presto! change-o! lifting of the Dome, to sweet, sweet fresh air and then, bam! The End. Well, it just all seemed rather hastily written to me, and didn't resonate as a satisfying ending.

In reading over some other critiques before writing this, I do admire King's antipathy for the Bush-Cheney administration and understand why he chose Dale Barbara as a vet of the War in Iraq, as his protagonist, and why he touches so often on the idea of wanton and casual torture; not as a means to an end, or because people are callous and cruel necessarily. It can be as simple as something to ease boredom, which is a hugely frightening thought. 


This is an un-retouched, un-Photo-Shopped picture. You can just see the evil dripping off this man. I have a short, short list of people I would dearly love to see underground; he's on it. I make no excuse for my lack of acceptance, tolerance, or forgiveness for those particular individuals, nor do I think that how I feel is a bad thing; at least I'm honest.

The metaphor and/or idea of raging little kids not being able to do anything but lash out at an unseen enemy when it was demonstrably clear that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 would seem preposterous, were it not for the fact that the Bush Administration proceeded to go ahead and do just that: invade Iraq, after the invasion of Afghanistan, and months of gleeful trumpeting about hidden WMDs in Iraq, which never existed, nor could they. Anyone paying two minutes of attention to current affairs in the 80s, 90s and 00s would know this; Iraq had not the infrastructure, nor the will after having their asses kicked in the Iran-Iraq conflict that was only ended, when a brokered peace eight years into the war, brought about a re-establishment of the pre-war borders. Iraq then went on to fail miserably in the invasion of Kuwait and subsequent ass-kicking from the U.S., so they were not really inclined to start up a new conflict. We saw a weakened country; a corrupt and teetering tyranny and took full advantage of it. But, I digress.

I was agreeing with King's assessment of the Bush-Cheney administration, although, King saw Cheney as Jim Rennie and Bush as Andy Sanders, the do-nothing selectman, who discovers the joys of becoming a tweaker. That part may be true; I've always had my suspicions about Bush. But, Cheney? Rennie is no where near as evil as that man. Enough said. Also let me add this; parts of the book were written a long time ago, and parts are new. Much of it is allegorical and I have to be honest. I have seldom read an allegorical book that worked, with the sole exception being C. S. Lewis and his “Chronicles of Narnia”. It's just always so painfully obvious to me, what the writer is trying to convey and it usually falls flat.

courtesy: narnia.wikia.com

Chronicles of Narnia, C. S. Lewis

Anyway, I had to force myself to finish the book, which is something unusual for me. I would love to read King's “November 22, 1963”, and see if that doesn't have a more adult tone about it. I didn't post earlier this week, as I just started a Clinical Trial, was gone all day, and stupidly didn't have a post ready for Wednesday. I will be hosting a cover reveal for a friend tomorrow, and can't wait! Anyway, happy rowing, fellow ROWers and more to come!